After reads too many reviews, I decided to buy the old Nikon 35-70 2,8 lens lens. This lens is supposed to have the same optical performance as the newer Nikon 24-70 2,8, but at a much lesser price (since it’s discontinued). The lens is built in metallic, since it is a professional lens. It’s bigger and heavier then consumer level zoom lenses, but much smaller that the huge Nikon 24-70 2,8.
One of the drawbacks is that the range is not optimal for a DX camera (since the DX crop factor makes the 35mm the lens to effectively 52mm, which is not so wide). The autofocus is also a bit slower than the newer Nikon 24-70.
Another drawback is that this lens is suppose to flare quite easily, at lease when shooting directly at the sun. The lens hood is not the best, my lens came with the HB-3 lens hood. I’ve read on numerous forums that other lens hood should minimize this behaviour, and I have ordered the Nikon HB-18 to try out instead. All lens hoods with the filter size 62mm could work for this lens, however some may cause it to vignette (especially on an FX camera). I ordered the The HB-18, which is used on the Nikon 28-105 3.5-4.5, but it didn’t fit, it had a different attachment :-(. Others have reported that lens hood HB-15, which is used on the Nikon 70-300 ED, should work fine on DX (and almost eliminate the flare problem) .
The lens is a push-pull zoomed, instead of twisting for zooming. As I read on the net, some does not like this, but after using the lens for a day, I have no problem at all pushing and pulling to zoom. The front of the lens does rotate during focusing, which is not so good when using polarize filters. If you can live with these drawbacks (I can), you will have a stunning lens which takes crisp and sharp images!
Here is two images of the lens:
Extended to 35mm
And some example photos (this is shoot with the “macro” mode, this lens has a button to use for macro in 35mm, manual focus only), which seems to work quite well:
Read Full Post »